Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study

Modulation of cortical responses by transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: A resting-state EEG and TMS-EEG study
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.brs.2018.06.004
复制
发表时间:
2018-09-01
期刊:
影响因子:
7.7
通讯作者:
Ziemann, Ulf
Ziemann, Ulf
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Gordon, Pedro Caldana;Zrenner, Christoph;Ziemann, Ulf

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激技术,具有成本效益的治疗性神经调节的潜力。虽然通过刺激背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)发现了积极的治疗效果,但很少有研究探讨DLPFC-tDCS的生理效应。目的:通过静息态脑电图(rs-EEG)和经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发/诱导的EEG反应,研究tDCS与应用于左侧DLPFC的不同参数设置对皮质反应的影响。22例健康受试者在双盲随机交叉设计中接受了5次不同tDCS参数设置的tDCS治疗(1:1.5 mA,阳极左DLPFC,阴极右DLPFC; 2:1.5 mA,阴极左DLPFC,阳极右DLPFC; 3:0.5 mA,阳极左DLPFC,阴极右DLPFC; 4:1.5 mA,阳极左DLPFC,阴极左三角肌; 5:假刺激)。结果:在tDCS条件下,Rs-EEG功率谱分析显示,刺激前和刺激后的Rs-EEG功率谱无明显差异。1.5mA左侧DLPFC阳极tDCS后,顶叶皮层的TMS-EEG诱发电位振幅降低,使用左侧DLPFC阳极tDCS的所有条件后,TMS诱导的伽马和θ振荡均降低。左DLPFC阴极tDCS未导致显著变化。没有干预后的变化是不同的条件下,包括sham.Conclusions比较的效果时,我们的研究没有提供证据表明,一个单一的tDCS会话结果在rs-EEG的显着变化,使用当前的刺激参数。在阳极1.5 mA tDCS干预后,观察到对TMS脉冲的EEG反应发生显著变化,尽管这些变化在组比较中不具有统计学显著性。(c)2018爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique with potential for cost-effective therapeutic neuromodulation. Although positive therapeutic effects were found by stimulating the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), few studies have investigated physiological effects of DLPFC-tDCS.Objectives: To investigate effects of tDCS with different parameter settings applied to the left DLPFC on cortical responses, measured by resting-state electroencephalography (rs-EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked/induced EEG responses.Methods: 22 healthy subjects underwent 5 tDCS sessions with different tDCS parameter settings in a double-blinded randomized crossover design (1: 1.5 mA, anode left-DLPFC, cathode right-DLPFC; 2: 1.5 mA, cathode left-DLPFC, anode right-DLPFC; 3: 0.5 mA, anode left-DLPFC, cathode right-DLPFC; 4: 1.5 mA, anode left-DLPFC, cathode left deltoid muscle; 5: sham stimulation). Rs-EEG and TMS-EEG were recorded before and after tDCS.Results: Rs-EEG power spectrum analysis showed no difference comparing baseline with post stimulation in any of the tDCS conditions. TMS-EEG evoked potential amplitude decreased in parietal cortex after 1.5mA left-DLPFC anodal tDCS, and TMS-induced gamma and theta oscillations decreased after all conditions using left-DLPFC anodal tDCS. Left-DLPFC cathodal tDCS did not lead to significant change. None of the post-intervention changes was different when comparing the effects across conditions, including sham.Conclusions: Our study does not provide evidence that a single tDCS session results in significant changes in rs-EEG, using the current stimulation parameters. Significant changes in EEG responses to TMS pulses were observed following the anodal 1.5 mA tDCS interventions, although these changes were not statistically significant in a group comparison. (c) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.