Adult Age Differences in Cued Recall.
Adult Age Differences in Cued Recall.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0012-1649.13.4.326
复制
发表时间：
1977-07
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
A. D. Smith
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. D. Smith
研究了72名男性大学毕业生的语义和结构检索线索的相对有效性，这些线索被分为3个年龄组：1组（20-39岁）、2组（40-59岁）和3组（60-80岁）。为了保证两组学生的记忆相容性，我们对两组学生进行了两项测试。测试结果表明，在无提示条件下（自由回忆）和在有提示条件下（有结构提示），年龄较大的学生的记忆能力明显较差。然而，当使用类别标签作为语义线索时，记忆中的年龄缺陷被消除了。结果分别从检索假设和加工缺陷假设两方面进行了讨论。（20 ref）（PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA，版权所有）
Examined the relative effectiveness of semantic and structural retrieval cues in 72 male college graduates of 3 age groups: Group 1 (aged 20–39 yrs), Group 2 (aged 40–59 yrs), and Group 3 (aged 60–80 yrs). The Ss had been administered 2 subtests of the WAIS to insure the compatibility of the Ss. Results of the recall tests show that there was significantly poorer recall by the older Ss in the noncued conditions (free recall) and in the cued condition when structural cues were used. When category labels were used as semantic cues, however, the age deficit in recall was eliminated. Results are discussed in terms of both a retrieval hypothesis and a processing-deficit hypothesis.(20 ref)(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)