Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences

Is presence a technology issue? Some insights from cognitive sciences
复制标题

存在是技术问题吗?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2009
期刊:
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
G. Riva
G. Riva
中科院分区:
计算机科学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Riva

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

国际临场感研究学会将“临场感”(术语“远程临场感”的缩写)定义为“一种心理状态,在这种状态下,即使一个人的当前体验的部分或全部是由人造技术产生和/或过滤的,但个人的部分或全部感知未能准确地认识到技术在体验中的作用”(ISPR 2000,临场感的概念:解释性陈述)。Http://ispr.info/访问2009年1月15日)。在这篇文章中,我们将借鉴认知科学的最新成果,为在场提供一个更广泛的定义,而不仅仅是与技术有关。具体地说,在场在这里被描述为一种核心的神经心理现象,其目标是产生一种代理和控制感:如果受试者能够在外部世界实施他们的意图,他们就是“在场”的。这一框架表明,任何环境,无论是虚拟的还是真实的,都不会提供无差别的信息,对每个人都是平等的现成对象。它提供不同的机会,并根据其支持用户的能力和他们的意图而产生存在。文中还讨论了这种方法对临场感虚拟环境开发的可能影响。
The International Society of Presence Research, defines “presence” (a shortened version of the term “telepresence”) as a “psychological state in which even though part or all of an individual’s current experience is generated by and/or filtered through human-made technology, part or all of the individual’s perception fails to accurately acknowledge the role of the technology in the experience” (ISPR 2000, The concept of presence: explication statement. http://ispr.info/ Accessed 15 Jan 2009). In this article, we will draw on the recent outcomes of cognitive sciences to offer a broader definition of presence, not related to technology only. Specifically, presence is described here as a core neuropsychological phenomenon whose goal is to produce a sense of agency and control: subjects are “present” if they are able to enact in an external world their intentions. This framework suggests that any environment, virtual or real, does not provide undifferentiated information, ready-made objects equal for everyone. It offers different opportunities and produces presence according to its ability in supporting the users and their intentions. The possible consequences of this approach for the development of presence-inducing virtual environments are also discussed.
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1261
发表时间: 2003-03-29
影响因子: 6.3
作者:
Meltzoff, AN;Decety, J
通讯作者: Decety, J