Parrhēsia and Credibility: The Sovereign of Refugee Status Determination
Parrhēsia and Credibility: The Sovereign of Refugee Status Determination
复制标题
Parrēsia 和可信度：难民身份确定的主权者
DOI：
10.1177/0964663909345094
复制
发表时间：
2009
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
G. Noll
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Beard;G. Noll
本文关注的是国际法中可信度与主权概念之间的关联及其与真理的关系。根据经验，作者重点关注联合国难民事务高级专员办事处实施的难民甄别程序的可信度评估。作者没有根据证据证明模型的法律程序对可信度评估提供合理的解释。相反，作者试图提出一种同时存在的可信度评估现象，以检验人类意义的真实性。这是一个政治问题，需要考虑个人主权和领土主权之间的紧张关系以及导致这种紧张关系的政治主体化过程。
This article is concerned with the correlation between credibility and the concept of sovereignty in international law and their relationship to truth. Empirically, the authors focus on the credibility assessment informing the refugee determination procedure operated by the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. The authors do not provide a rationalized explanation of credibility assessment in terms of a legal procedure turning on probative models of evidence. Instead, the authors attempt to draw out a concurrent phenomenon of credibility assessment, which tests the truth of what it means to be human. This is a political question that requires a consideration of the tension between personal sovereignty and territorial sovereignty and the process of political subjectivization that conditions that tension.