Towards healthy theorising about health behaviours in the maze of messy reality: a reaction to Peters, de Bruin, and Crutzen
Towards healthy theorising about health behaviours in the maze of messy reality: a reaction to Peters, de Bruin, and Crutzen
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/17437199.2014.900722
复制
发表时间：
2015-01-01
影响因子：
9.8
通讯作者：
Michie, Susan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Johnson, Blair T.;Michie, Susan
Peters， de Bruin和Crutzen（2013）得出结论：(1)过去的研究综合往往忽略了行为理论的细节，导致可疑的结论和无效的健康促进努力；(2)为证据基础积累（IPEBA）提供了一个迭代协议，作为一种混合理论，实验和实验元分析工作的方法。本着科学精神，我们衷心同意，如果改进方法是可能和可行的，就应该这样做，特别是当结果能够改善公共卫生时。话虽如此，我们认为，IPEBA实例化的努力需要考虑到经常混乱的研究现实中的几个顽固的细节：
Peters, de Bruin, and Crutzen (2013) concluded (1) that past research syntheses have often neglected the finer points of behavioural theories, making for dubious conclusions and ineffective health promotion efforts and (2) offered an iterative protocol for evidence base accumulation (IPEBA) as a way to blend work from theories, experiments and metaanalyses of experiments. In the spirit of science, we heartily agree that when it is possible and feasible to improve methods one should do so, especially when the outcomes can improve public health. That said, we believe that efforts to instantiate IPEBA need to account for several stubborn particulars of an all-too-often messy research reality: