Comparison of the ellipsis-based theory of non-constituent coordination with its alternatives
Comparison of the ellipsis-based theory of non-constituent coordination with its alternatives
复制标题
基于省略的非成分协调理论与其替代理论的比较
DOI：
10.21248/hpsg.2012.26
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Shûichi Yatabe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shûichi Yatabe
在本文中，我比较了在中提出的基于省略的非成分协调理论
Yatabe（2001）及其三个替代方案，即已被广泛接受的理论，
范畴语法的语境、Mouret的基于HPSG的理论和Bachrach的理论
和Katzir在极简方案的框架内。它被发现（i），基于CG的理论，
非成分协调不能处理中间RNR，即右节点提升的子集
在这些构造中，全部或一部分右节点凸起的材料以
位置以外的最后合取的右边缘，（ii）Mouret的理论遇到
类似的困难时，适用于RNR，和（iii）Bachrach和Katzir的理论不能
应用于英语中的左节点提升，难以捕捉中间的语义惰性
RNR，并以多种方式过度生成。另一方面，基于省略的理论似乎是
与所有观察结果一致。
In this paper, I compare the ellipsis-based theory of non-constituent coordination proposed in
Yatabe (2001) with three of its alternatives, namely the theory that has been widely accepted within
the context of Categorial Grammar, Mouret's HPSG-based theory, and the theory proposed by Bachrach
and Katzir in the framework of the Minimalist Program. It is found (i) that the CG-based theory of
non-constituent coordination cannot deal with medial RNR, i.e. a subset of right-node raising
constructions in which either all or a part of the right-node-raised material is realized at a
location other than the right edge of the final conjunct, (ii) that Mouret's theory encounters
similar difficulties when applied to RNR, and (iii) that Bachrach and Katzir's theory cannot be
applied to left-node raising in English, has difficulty capturing the semantic inertness of medial
RNR, and overgenerates in several ways. The ellipsis-based theory, on the other hand, appears to be
consistent with all the observations.