Do special noncovalent π-π stacking interactions really exist?
Do special noncovalent π-π stacking interactions really exist?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/anie.200705157
复制
发表时间:
2008-01-01
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
Grimme, Stefan
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grimme, Stefan
Noncovalent interactions play an increasingly important role in modern chemical research, and are nowadays considered as cornerstones in supramolecular chemistry, materials science, and even biochemistry.[1] When unsaturated organic groups are involved in noncovalent interactions, the terms “π–π stacking”, or more generally “π–π interactions” are often used. As noted recently,[2] this classification has a quite mysterious flavor. For larger structures, π–π stacking is a phenomenon that is theoretically not well understood, although some progress has been made.[3, 4] From many studies of the benzene dimer [5–7] and other complexes involving phenyl rings,[2, 8] it can be concluded that the π orbitals do not function as in conventional overlapdriven covalent bonding, although this is not common knowledge.[9] The prototypical benzene dimer is nowadays considered a typical van der Waals complex in which the long-range dispersion interactions (dominant RÀ6 dependence of the interaction energy on interfragment distance [10]) play the major role. As a consequence, the dimer is unbound at uncorrelated Hartree–Fock and many density functional theory (DFT) levels.[11] This more sophisticated view is increasingly replacing Hunter s model [12] of π–π interactions, which (over) emphasises the mainly quadrupole–quadrupole electrostatic component of the interaction in benzene-type systems (see Ref.[13] for recent theoretical work on polar πsystems).Because van der Waals complexes are formed by almost all neutral, closed-shell molecules, which are considered exclusively herein, what should be so special about the interaction between stacked aromatic units compared to, for example, saturated (hydrogenated) rings of about the same size. This mainly energetic difference is termed herein the π–π stacking effect (PSE). For example, benzene and cyclohexane both exist as fluids at room temperature, which indicates similar intermolecular interactions. According to accurate CCSD (T) computations, the stacked (parallel-displaced, PD) benzene dimer has an even smaller binding energy than the pentane dimer (À2. 8 vs. À3. 9 kcal molÀ1),[2, 14] which has the