Empirical identification of the major facets of Conscientiousness
Empirical identification of the major facets of Conscientiousness
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.lindif.2009.03.007
复制
发表时间：
2009-12-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
Roberts, Richard D.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MacCann, Carolyn;Duckworth, Angela Lee;Roberts, Richard D.
尽责性通常被发现可以预测学术成果，但不同的人格模型对尽责性的定义不同。高中生（N = 291）完成了大量的责任感项目，从不同的模型和大五量表（BFI）。探索性和验证性因素分析的项目揭示了八个方面：勤奋，完美主义，整洁，拖延克制，控制，谨慎，任务规划和毅力。这些方面和BFI之间的相关性表明，所有方面都与尽责性密切相关。效标相关效度通过各方面与学业成绩（如平均成绩、违纪行为和获得学术荣誉）之间的关系来证明。与BFI相比，尽责性、勤奋性和完美主义分别对缺勤和认知测试成绩有更强的预测力。结果进行了讨论方面的分数的有用性，解释人格分数的选择，和干预方案的发展。(C)2009爱思唯尔公司版权所有
Conscientiousness is often found to predict academic outcomes, but is defined differently by different models of personality. High school students (N = 291) completed a large number of Conscientiousness items from different models and the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the items uncovered eight facets: Industriousness, Perfectionism, Tidiness, Procrastination Refrainment, Control, Cautiousness, Task Planning, and Perseverance. Correlations between these facets and the BFI revealed that all facets related strongly to Conscientiousness. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by relationships between facets and academic outcomes such as grade-point-average, disciplinary infractions, and attainment of academic honors. Compared to BFI Conscientiousness, Industriousness and Perfectionism showed significantly stronger prediction of absenteeism and cognitive test scores, respectively. Results are discussed in terms of the usefulness of facet scores, the interpretation of personality scores for selection, and the development of intervention programs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved