sHIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based ART: Collaborative analysis of cohort studies.

sHIV-1 drug resistance in people on dolutegravir-based ART: Collaborative analysis of cohort studies.
复制标题

接受基于多替拉韦的 ART 人群中 sHIV-1 耐药性:队列研究的协作分析。

DOI:
10.1101/2023.04.05.23288183
复制
发表时间:
2023
期刊:
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Günthard,Huldry
Günthard,Huldry
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Loosli,Tom;Hossmann,Stefanie;Ingle,SuzanneM;Okhai,Hajra;Kusejko,Katharina;Mouton,Johannes;Bellecave,Pantxika;vanSighem,Ard;Stecher,Melanie;d'ArminioMonforte,Antonella;Gill,MJohn;Sabin,CarolineA;Maartens,Gary;Günthard,Huldry

文献摘要

相似文献

背景资料:在一线和二线抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)中广泛使用整合酶链转移抑制剂(DITI)度鲁特韦(DTG)可能会促进出现耐药性。我们结合了来自HIV队列的数据,以检查耐药突变(DRM)的模式,并确定DTG耐药的风险因素。研究方法:来自加拿大、欧洲和南非的8个队列提供了对基于DTG的ART进行基因型耐药检测的个体数据。使用斯坦福大学算法对耐药水平进行分类。我们使用混合效应有序逻辑回归模型确定了耐药的危险因素。结果:我们纳入了2013年至2022年期间对基于DTG的ART进行基因型耐药检测的750人。大多数患者患有HIV亚型B(N=444,59·2%),并且有治疗经验; 134例(17·9%)接受DTG双重治疗,19例(2·5%)接受DTG单药治疗。在100例(13.3%)个体中检测到了CIMI DRMs; 21例(2.8%)有一个以上的突变。713株(95.1%)对DTG敏感,8株(1.1%)为低抗,5株(0.7%)为低抗,18株(2.4%)为中抗,6株(0.8%)为高抗。DTG单药治疗的DTG耐药风险较高(校正比值比(aOR)37·25,95% CI 11·17至124·2)和DTG拉米夫定双重治疗(aOR 6.59,95% CI 1.70至25.55),在潜在低/低剂量情况下更高(aOR 4.62,95%CI 1.24至17.2)或中/高水平(aOR 7.01,95%CI 2.52至19.48)核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI)耐药。DTG上的病毒载量显示DTG耐药性增加的趋势(aOR 1.42,95% CI 0.92至2.19,根据log 10病毒载量曲线下面积的标准差)。解释:在基于DTG的ART病毒学失败的人群中,CDFI DRMs不常见,DTG耐药罕见。DTG单药治疗和NRTI耐药大大增加了DTG耐药的风险,这是一个值得关注的问题,特别是在资源有限的环境中。
Background: The widespread use of the integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) dolutegravir (DTG) in first- and second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) may facilitate emerging resistance. We combined data from HIV cohorts to examine patterns of drug resistance mutations (DRMs) and identify risk factors for DTG resistance. Methods: Eight cohorts from Canada, Europe, and South Africa contributed data on individuals with genotypic resistance testing on DTG-based ART. Resistance levels were categorised using the Stanford algorithm. We identified risk factors for resistance using mixed-effects ordinal logistic regression models. Results: We included 750 people with genotypic resistance testing on DTG-based ART between 2013 and 2022. Most had HIV subtype B (N=444, 59·2%) and were treatment-experienced; 134 (17.9%) were on DTG dual and 19 (2.5%) on DTG monotherapy. INSTI DRMs were detected in 100 (13·3%) individuals; 21 (2·8%) had more than one mutation. Most (N=713, 95·1%) were susceptible to DTG, 8 (1·1%) had potential-low, 5 (0·7%) low, 18 (2·4%) intermediate and 6 (0·8%) high-level DTG resistance. The risk of DTG resistance was higher on DTG monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 37·25, 95% CI 11·17 to 124·2) and DTG lamivudine dual therapy (aOR 6·59, 95% CI 1·70 to 25·55) compared to combination ART, and higher in the presence of potential-low/low (aOR 4.62, 95% CI 1.24 to 17.2) or intermediate/high-level (aOR 7·01, 95% CI 2·52 to 19·48) nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) resistance. Viral load on DTG showed a trend towards increased DTG resistance (aOR 1·42, 95% CI 0·92 to 2·19 per standard deviation of log10 area under the viral load curve). Interpretation: Among people experiencing virological failure on DTG-based ART, INSTI DRMs were uncommon, and DTG resistance was rare. DTG monotherapy and NRTI resistance substantially increased the risk for DTG resistance, which is of concern, notably in resource-limited settings.