Comparison of different scoring systems for the Japanese version of the General Health Questionnaire.
Comparison of different scoring systems for the Japanese version of the General Health Questionnaire.
复制标题
日本版一般健康问卷不同评分系统的比较。
DOI：
10.1159/000284808
复制
发表时间：
1993
期刊：
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
M. Sugawara
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Kitamura;S. Shima;M. Toda;M. Sugawara
一般健康问卷（GHQ）是一个自我评定问卷，以确定当前的非器质性非精神病发病率。GHQ的每个项目都有四个响应代码;左边的代表最健康，右边的代表最不健康。GHQ项目的四个评分系统区分精神病病例和非病例的能力，0-0-0-1（代码1-3 = 0，代码4 = 1），0-0-1-1（代码1和2 = 0，代码3和4 = 1，原始GHQ评分）和0-1-1-1（代码1 = 0，代码2-4 = 1），与相邻代码之间病例率的最大增加进行比较，并使用判别函数分析，以三种评分系统作为预测因子，在108名产前门诊就诊者中进行。数据显示，最初的GHQ评分在识别精神病病例方面是最有效的。
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is a self-rating questionnaire to identify current non-organic non-psychotic morbidity. Each item of the GHQ has four response codes; the left-side one represents the most healthy while the right-side one the most ill. The ability of four scoring systems of the GHQ items to discriminate psychiatric cases from non-cases, 0-0-0-1 (codes 1-3 = 0, code 4 = 1), 0-0-1-1 (codes 1 and 2 = 0, codes 3 and 4 = 1, the original GHQ scoring) and 0-1-1-1 (code 1 = 0, codes 2-4 = 1), were compared against the greatest increase in the rate of cases between neighbouring codes and by using discriminant function analysis with the three scoring systems as predictors among 108 antenatal clinic attenders. The data revealed that the original GHQ scoring was the most valid in its ability to identify psychiatric cases.