The Invisibility of Disability: Using Dance to Shake from Bioethics the Idea of 'Broken Bodies'.
The Invisibility of Disability: Using Dance to Shake from Bioethics the Idea of 'Broken Bodies'.
复制标题
残疾的隐形：用舞蹈从生物伦理学中动摇“破碎的身体”的观念。
DOI：
10.1111/bioe.12139
复制
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Harmon SH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Harmon SH
复杂的社会和伦理问题往往是最有效的解决，让他们在混乱和不舒服的学科和实践的交叉点，一个概念，理由看不见的差异项目，旨在扩大思维和改变实践周围的制作，地位，所有权，和价值的工作由当代舞蹈编舞通过检查编舞工作的镜头法律，生物伦理学，舞蹈奖学金，以及残疾舞者的舞蹈实践这篇文章提供了一个关键的论文如何生物伦理学已经占据了边缘和边缘化的作用，在问题上的不同的能力的身体。这样做，它使残疾人社区在很大程度上不为生物伦理学所注意，也不为生物伦理学所注意。然后，它辩护的主张，生物伦理学-作为一个社会事业，由来自不同学科的个人合作追求-必须采取更好地注意身体和体现个人，如果它是更好地实现其目标，其中包括建设一个道德和公正的社会。最后，这篇文章考虑了艺术，特别是舞蹈（这里是由不同能力的舞者跳舞），如何为我们提供关于身体和我们对正常“其他”身体做出积极反应的能力的丰富证据。它的结论是，更多地关注经验证据，如在无形的差异中产生的将有助于扩大生物伦理学的范围和意义，从而其相关性（和意识）的重要问题的地位，身体和身体的差异，必须被视为中央的野心。
Complex social and ethical problems are often most effectively solved by engaging them at the messy and uncomfortable intersections of disciplines and practices, a notion that grounds the InVisible Difference project, which seeks to extend thinking and alter practice around the making, status, ownership, and value of work by contemporary dance choreographers by examining choreographic work through the lenses of law, bioethics, dance scholarship, and the practice of dance by differently‐abled dancers. This article offers a critical thesis on how bioethics has come to occupy a marginal and marginalizing role in questions about the differently‐abled body. In doing so, it has rendered the disabled community largely invisible to and in bioethics. It then defends the claim that bioethics – as a social undertaking pursued collaboratively by individuals from different disciplines – must take much better notice of the body and the embodied individual if it is to better achieve its ends, which include constructing a moral and just society. Finally, this article considers how the arts, and specifically dance (and here dance by differently‐abled dancers), provides us with rich evidence about the body and our ability to respond positively to normally ‘othered’ bodies. It concludes that greater attention to empirical evidence like that being generated in InVisible Difference will help to expand the reach and significance of bioethics, and thereby its relevance to (and consciousness of) important questions about the status of bodies and bodily differences, which must be considered as central to its ambitions.