(Re)negotiating East and Southeast Asia : region, regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
(Re)negotiating East and Southeast Asia : region, regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations
复制标题
东亚和东南亚（重新）谈判：地区、地区主义和东南亚国家联盟
DOI：
10.1355/cs33-1h
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Ba
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Ba
这本书试图解释与东南亚国家联盟(东盟)相关的两个核心悖论：面对相互竞争的利益、不同的偏好和可以说是薄弱的合作，不同的国家如何团结一致并稳定关系？一群自我认同程度较低的东南亚强国如何超越其最初的地区权限，塑造亚太和东亚地区主义的形式和内容？根据艾丽斯·巴的说法，答案在于东盟的创始论点：这些论点的前提是假定的地区不团结。她展示了这些论点如何得出关键的因果联系，使东南亚地区主义成为对问题的必要回应，导致其决定性的非正式性和寻求共识的过程，并限制了东盟的地区主义。她回顾了40年来关于东盟区域内和区域外关系的辩论，主张以过程为导向的合作观点，揭示了争论和辩论的中间过程，并强调了区域和地区主义建设中相互作用的物质、观念和社会力量。
This book seeks to explain two core paradoxes associated with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): How have diverse states hung together and stabilized relations in the face of competing interests, divergent preferences, and arguably weak cooperation? How has a group of lesser, self-identified Southeast Asian powers gone beyond its original regional purview to shape the form and content of Asian Pacific and East Asian regionalisms? According to Alice Ba, the answers lie in ASEAN's founding arguments: arguments that were premised on an assumed regional disunity. She demonstrates how these arguments draw critical causal connections that make Southeast Asian regionalism a necessary response to problems, give rise to its defining informality and consensus-seeking process, and also constrain ASEAN's regionalism. Tracing debates about ASEAN's intra- and extra-regional relations over four decades, she argues for a process-driven view of cooperation, sheds light on intervening processes of argument and debate, and highlights interacting material, ideational, and social forces in the construction of regions and regionalisms.