Translating the chronic care model into the community - Results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention

Translating the chronic care model into the community - Results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention
复制标题

DOI:
10.2337/diacare.29.04.06.dc05-1785
复制
发表时间:
2006-04-01
期刊:
影响因子:
16.2
通讯作者:
Zgibor, JC
Zgibor, JC
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Piatt, GA;Orchard, TJ;Zgibor, JC

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的-以确定是否使用慢性病护理模式(CCM)在一个欠发达的社区导致改善临床和行为的结果为people with diabetes.RESEARCH设计和METHODS -这个多层次的,集群设计,随机对照试验研究的有效性CCM为基础的干预在欠发达的城市社区。沿着11名初级保健实践者及其患者被随机分为三组:CCM干预组(n = 30例患者)、仅提供者教育组(PROV组)(n = 38)和常规护理组(UC组)(n = 51)。调整聚类后,相关性的大小仍然很强(P = 0.01)。在CCM组中,非HDL胆固醇的下降和自我监测血糖的参与者比例也观察到了相同的模式(非HDL胆固醇:-10.4 mg/dl,P = 0.24;自我监测血糖:+22.2%,P < 0.0001),组间改善差异具有统计学意义(非HDL胆固醇:P = 0.05;自我监测血糖:P = 0.03)。CCM组还显示出HDL胆固醇(+5.5 mg/dl,P = 0.0004)、糖尿病知识测试得分(+6.7%,P = 0.07)和授权得分(+2,P = 0.02hCCUSIONS-这些结果表明,在社区实施CCM可有效改善糖尿病患者的临床和行为结局。
OBJECTIVE - To determine whether using the chronic care model (CCM) in an underserved community leads to improved clinical and behavioral outcomes for people with diabetes.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - This multilevel, cluster-design, randomized controlled trial examined the effectiveness of a CCM-based intervention in an underserved urban community. Eleven primary care practices, along with their patients, were randomized to three groups: CCM intervention (n = 30 patients), provider education only (PROV group) (n = 38), and usual care (UC group) (n = 51).RESULTS - A marked decline in HbA(1c) was observed in the CCM group (-0.6%, P = 0.008) but not in the other groups. The magnitude of the association remained strong after adjustment for clustering (P = 0,01). The same pattern was observed for a decline in non-HDL cholesterol and for the proportion of participants who self-monitor blood glucose in the CCM group (non-HDL cholesterol: -10.4 mg/dl, P = 0.24; self-monitor blood glucose: +22.2%, P < 0.0001), with statistically significant between-group differences in improvement (non-HDL cholesterol: P = 0.05; self-monitor blood glucose: P = 0.03) after adjustment. The CCM group also showed improvement in HDL cholesterol (+5.5 mg/dl, P = 0.0004), diabetes knowledge test scores (+6.7%, P = 0.07), and empowerment scores (+2, P = 0.02).CONCLUSIONS - These results suggest that implementing the CCM in the community is effective in improving clinical and behavioral Outcomes in patients with diabetes.