Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.

Preference for Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection and Papanicolaou: Survey of Underscreened Women in North Carolina.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1097/lgt.0000000000000430
复制
发表时间:
2018-10
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Smith JS
Smith JS
中科院分区:
医学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kilfoyle KA;Des Marais AC;Ngo MA;Romocki L;Richman AR;Barclay L;Brewer NT;Rahangdale L;Smith JS

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

自我采集人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)检测样本(自我采集)有可能增加筛查不足的妇女中的宫颈癌筛查。我们评估了这些高危人群对家庭HPV自我采集与基于诊所的巴氏杆菌检测的态度。参与者是北卡罗来纳州的低收入女性,早该进行宫颈癌筛查。妇女在家中自行采集样本,邮寄样本进行HPV检测,并填写家庭HPV自我采集电话问卷。参与者被转介到以诊所为基础的巴氏检测,并被邀请完成关于巴氏检测的第二份问卷。横断面问卷比较了自我采集与巴氏涂片检测的态度、经历和偏好,并评估了HPV自我采集偏好的预测因素。在221名女性中,一半(51%)报告倾向于HPV自我收集,19%倾向于巴氏试验,27%报告没有偏好。更多的女性表示很难抽出时间做巴氏测试(31%)而不是自我测试(13%,p=0.003),更多的女性对自我测试结果感到害怕(50%)而不是巴氏测试结果(36%)(p=0.02)。自我收集的身体不适和疼痛的报告相对较少(不适感:18%自我;48%自我;疼痛:8%自我;30%自我,p=0.001)。在对测试的正面和负面想法、对测试的安全性和准确性的信任以及是否愿意再次进行测试方面,没有发现差异。总体而言,在筛查不足的妇女中,与巴氏检测相比,对HPV自我收集的积极态度表明,在这一高危人群中,自我收集是一个有希望的选择,可以增加宫颈癌筛查。
Self-collection of samples for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing (self-collection) has the potential to increase cervical cancer screening among underscreened women. We assessed attitudes towards at-home HPV self-collection compared to clinic-based Pap testing in this higher risk population. Participants were low-income, women in North Carolina overdue for cervical cancer screening. Women self-collected samples at home, returned samples by mail for HPV testing, and completed phone questionnaires about at-home HPV self-collection. Participants were referred to clinic-based Pap testing and invited to complete a second questionnaire about Pap testing. A cross-sectional questionnaire compared attitudes, experiences, and preferences for self-collection versus Pap testing, and assessed predictors of preference for HPV self-collection. Half (51%) of 221 women reported a preference for HPV self-collection, 19% preferred Pap testing, and 27% reported no preference. More women reported finding difficulty finding time to do the Pap test (31%) than the self-test (13%, p=0.003), and being afraid of the self-test results (50%) than the Pap test results (36%, p=0.02). There were relatively fewer reports of physical discomfort and pain from self-collection than Pap testing (discomfort: 18% self; 48% Pap; pain: 8% self; 30% Pap, p=0.001). No differences were found in positive versus negative thoughts about the tests, trust in the tests’ safety and accuracy, or willingness to do tests again. Overall positive attitudes towards HPV self-collection compared to Pap testing among underscreened women suggest that self-collection is a promising option to increase cervical cancer screening in this high-risk population.