Diagnostic Value of Nasopharyngeal Aspirates in Children with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.
Diagnostic Value of Nasopharyngeal Aspirates in Children with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.
复制标题
鼻咽抽吸物对小儿下呼吸道感染的诊断价值
DOI:
10.4103/0366-6999.201595
复制
发表时间:
2017-03-20
影响因子:
6.1
通讯作者:
Zhang XB
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lu AZ;Shi P;Wang LB;Qian LL;Zhang XB
Background: The accuracy of nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) specimens in detecting lower respiratory pathogens remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of aspirates (NPAs) specimen in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children. Methods: The prospective study was designed to collect the data of paired NPAs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from children with acute LRTIs from January 2013 to December 2015. All specimens were subjected to pathogen detection: bacterial detection by culture, Mycoplasma pneumoniae (Mp) detection by polymerase chain reaction assay and virus (influenza A and B viruses, parainfluenza virus [PIV] Types 1 and 3, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus) detection by immunofluorescence assay. The diagnostic accuracy analysis of NPAs was stratified by age ⩽3 years (n = 194) and >3 years (n = 294). Results: We collected paired specimens from 488 children. The positive rate of pathogen was 61.6%. For Streptococcus pneumoniae, NPA culture had the specificity of 89.9% and negative predictive value of 100% in age ⩽3 years, the specificity of 97.2% and negative predictive value of 98.9% in age >3 years. For Mp, the positive predictive values of NPA was 77.4% in children ⩽3 years, and 89.1% in children >3 years. For PIV III, NPA specimen had the specificity of 99.8% and negative predictive value of 96.5% in children ⩽3 years. For adenovirus, NPA had the specificity of 97.8% and negative predictive value of 98.4% in age ⩽3 years, the specificity of 98.9% and negative predictive value of 99.3% in age >3 years. Conclusions: NPAs are less invasive diagnostic respiratory specimens, a negative NPA result is helpful in “rule out” lower airway infection; however, a positive result does not reliably “rule in” the presence of pathogens.