The impact of inter-observer variation in pathological assessment of node-negative breast cancer on clinical risk assessment and patient selection for adjuvant systemic treatment

The impact of inter-observer variation in pathological assessment of node-negative breast cancer on clinical risk assessment and patient selection for adjuvant systemic treatment
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/annonc/mdp273
复制
发表时间:
2010-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
50.5
通讯作者:
van de Vijver, M. J.
van de Vijver, M. J.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bueno-de-Mesquita, J. M.;Nuyten, D. S. A.;van de Vijver, M. J.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

方法:分析694例<61岁原发性单侧T1-4N0M0乳腺癌患者的临床和病理资料。首先在当地评估等级、雌激素受体(ER)状态和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)状态;随后对这些参数进行了集中重新评估。使用荷兰国家指南和佐剂评估临床病理学低风险或高风险!在线(www.adjuvantonline.com)。 结果:局部病理检查与中央审查的分级、ER 和 HER2 不一致的患者分别为 28%(kappa 0.56;2 级肿瘤 35% 不一致)、5%(kappa 0.85)和 4%(kappa 0.81)。如果根据荷兰指南或佐剂评估临床风险!在网上,分别有 15%(7 名患者之一;kappa 0.70)或 8%(kappa 0.83)的患者被分配到不同的临床风险组。 结论:乳腺癌病理检查的观察者间差异导致分级、ER 状态、HER2 状态、临床病理风险以及随后的辅助全身治疗建议存在显着差异。
Methods: Clinical and pathological data of 694 patients < 61 years with primary unilateral T1-4N0M0 breast cancer were analysed. Grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status were first assessed locally; subsequent central re-evaluation of these parameters was carried out. Clinicopathological low or high risk was assessed using national Dutch guidelines and the Adjuvant! Online (www.adjuvantonline.com).Results: The local pathological examination was discordant with central review for grade, ER and HER2 in 28% (kappa 0.56; grade 2 tumours 35% discordant), 5% (kappa 0.85) and 4% (kappa 0.81) of patients, respectively. If clinical risk were assessed based on Dutch guidelines or Adjuvant! Online, respectively, 15% (one of seven patients; kappa 0.70) or 8% (kappa 0.83) of patients would have been assigned to a different clinical risk group.Conclusion: Inter-observer variation in pathological examination of breast carcinomas results in significant differences in grade, ER status, HER2 status, clinicopathological risk and subsequently in adjuvant systemic treatment advice.