Possible mechanisms of primary angle-closure and malignant glaucoma
Possible mechanisms of primary angle-closure and malignant glaucoma
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/00061198-200304000-00013
复制
发表时间:
2003-04-01
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Congdon, NG
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Quigley, HA;Friedman, DS;Congdon, NG
During the last 5 years, population-based prevalence surveys, large-scale clinical evaluations, and technological advances in diagnostic methods have contributed to our understanding of primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). During the early 20th century, the association between eyes with high tactile pressure, pain, and rapid blindness was called “acute congestive” glaucoma. Eighty years ago, Curran1 documented the beneficial effect of iridotomy in these eyes and proposed that they had impaired aqueous humor flow into the anterior chamber. Since these eyes represented the vast majority of those recognized to have glaucoma, he doubted that there were very many cases of glaucoma with no symptoms and lower levels of intraocular pressure (IOP), the condition that we now recognize as open-angle glaucoma (OAG).Rosengren2 performed a remarkably modern biometric analysis of the anterior segment in glaucoma eyes, detecting 2 groups of patients. Those with shallower anterior chambers had higher IOP and were symptomatic, while those with chambers of normal depth had asymptomatic glaucoma. This was the first quantitative separation of the 2 major forms of primary glaucoma. While Barkan popularized gonioscopy for glaucoma diagnosis and made seminal observations to distinguish PACG from OAG, 3, 4 only his later publications show acceptance of the importance of resistance to aqueous humor movement through the pupil. 5 Instead, he stressed the