The International (Lesbian and) Gay Association and the question of pedophilia: Tracking the demise of gay liberation ideals
The International (Lesbian and) Gay Association and the question of pedophilia: Tracking the demise of gay liberation ideals
复制标题
国际（女同性恋和）男同性恋协会和恋童癖问题：追踪同性恋解放理想的消亡
DOI：
10.1177/1363460713511103
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
1.5
通讯作者：
David Paternotte
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
David Paternotte
1993-1994年，国际男女同性恋者协会(ILGA)失去了其在联合国经济及社会理事会(经社理事会)的观察员地位，因为美国保守团体公布了两个恋童癖团体的成员身份。这篇文章考察了在此次活动之前国际恋童癖协会内部关于恋童癖的辩论，并记录了支持恋童癖立场的缓慢下降。它将他们与关于同性恋解放的更广泛的辩论联系在一起，并认为，当想象同性恋解放的新方法和新的政治目标出现时，支持恋童癖的论点失去了大部分吸引力。除了代际性别的问题，它还表明，这些辩论也是关于活动人士希望共同建立的那种运动。
In 1993–1994, the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA) lost its observer status in the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) because US conservative groups publicised the membership of two pedophile groups. This article examines debates on pedophilia within ILGA before this event, and documents the slow decline of pro-pedophilia stances. It relates them to wider debates on gay liberation, and argues that pro-pedophilia arguments lost most of their appeal when new ways of imagining homosexual emancipation and new political goals emerged. Beyond the issue of intergenerational sex, it shows these debates were also about the kind of movement activists wanted to build together.