The Professional Identity of Contributors to the "Journal of Counseling & Development": Does It Matter?.
The Professional Identity of Contributors to the "Journal of Counseling & Development": Does It Matter?.
复制标题
《咨询杂志》撰稿人的职业身份
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Fong Chan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Stephen G. Weinrach;K. Thomas;Fong Chan
R. K. Goodyear（2000）批评了一项研究的方法和结果，该研究表明，在Goodyear（1984-1990）和Claiborn（1990-1993）的编辑任期内，在《咨询与发展杂志》（JCD）上发表心理学家而不是咨询师撰写的文章的趋势。期刊内容的问题是职业认同的核心。提交人声称，与发表在JCD上的文章内容相比，投稿人的专业隶属关系更重要（即，文章必须“使用”咨询师的语言，而不是其他一些精神卫生专业人员的语言）。
R. K. Goodyear (2000) criticized the methodology and results of a study which demonstrated that during the editorial terms of Goodyear (1984–1990) and Claiborn (1990–1993) there was a trend toward publishing articles written by psychologists as opposed to counselors in the Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD). The issue of journal content goes to the heart of professional identity. The authors assert that professional affiliation of contributors matters less than the content of the articles published in JCD (i.e., articles must “speak” the language of counselors and not the language of some other mental health professional).