PREVALENCE AND SOCIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN - UNITED-STATES AND ITS URBAN CENTERS
PREVALENCE AND SOCIAL DISTRIBUTION OF MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN - UNITED-STATES AND ITS URBAN CENTERS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/00224499509551795
复制
发表时间：
1995-01-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
CATANIA, JA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BINSON, D;MICHAELS, S;CATANIA, JA
关于男男性行为者的社会分布和艾滋病相关风险行为的流行率数据来自两项全国概率调查[一般社会调查（GSS）和全国健康和社会生活调查（NHSLS）]以及美国城市中心的概率调查[全国艾滋病行为调查（NABS）]。居住在大城市的男性、受过高等教育的男性和白人更有可能报告与男性发生性关系。在城市抽样调查中，三分之一的人报告与妇女发生性关系。此外，少数族裔男性更有可能报告与男性发生性行为。和妇女超过一半的男性与HN风险因素报告一致使用避孕套。这些调查基于两种不同的采访模式（自我管理和电话），由不同的组织独立进行。这些调查得出的流行率估计数相互一致，并与美国和欧洲的其他人口调查一致。我们讨论这些数据的性研究人员之间正在进行的辩论如何解释目前的人口估计同性恋行为相比，金赛和他的同事报告的估计（1948年和1953年）。我们讨论了这种差异的一些可能的来源或解释（抽样，报告，随时间的变化）。我们的发现，考虑到。在概念和定义问题上，差异可能并不像最初看起来那么大。我们还讨论了我们的研究结果的社会分布和性风险行为的同性恋和双性恋男子居住在。美国的主要城市中心，以及对抗艾滋病流行所需战略的影响。
Prevalence data on, the social distribution and AIDS-related risk behavior of men who have sex with men are presented from two national probability surveys [General Social Survey (GSS) and National Health and Social Life Survey (NHSLS)] and a probability survey of urban centers in the U.S. [National AIDS Behavioral Surveys (NABS)]. Men residing in large cities, the highly educated, and Whites were more likely to report sex with men. In the urban, sample (NABS), one third reported sex with women. In addition, minority men were more likely to report sex with men. and women. More than half of the men with an HN risk factor reported consistent condom use. The surveys were based on two different modes of interviewing (self-administered and telephone), conducted independently of each other and by different organizations. The prevalence estimates from these surveys are consistent with each other and with other population-based surveys in the United States and Europe. We discuss these data in light of the ongoing debate among sex researchers about how to interpret current population estimates of homosexual behavior compared to estimates reported by Kinsey and his colleagues (1948 and 1953). We discuss some possible sources or explanations for this difference (sampling, reporting, change over time). What we found, taking into consideration. conceptual and definitional issues, is that the difference may not be as large as it at first seems. We also discuss our findings on the social distribution and sexual risk behavior of homosexual and bisexual men residing in. the major urban centers of the U.S. and implications for strategies needed to combat the AIDS epidemic.