Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: a closer look at effectiveness and equity
Payments for ecosystem services in the tropics: a closer look at effectiveness and equity
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.001
复制
发表时间：
2015-06-01
影响因子：
7.2
通讯作者：
Gross-Camp, N.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Calvet-Mir, L.;Corbera, E.;Gross-Camp, N.
我们进行审查的学术文献，研究的有效性和公平相关的性能的生态系统服务费用支付的举措，针对热带和亚热带国家的生物多样性保护。我们调查这些分析的主要特点，就其分析和方法的方法，我们确定新出现的经验教训，从PES实践，导致一个新的建议的研究议程。我们的研究结果表明，生态系统服务补偿有效性的分析集中在生态系统服务的提供或栖息地代理，只有一半的人作出明确的额外性评估和大多数描述的付款一直有利于土地覆盖和生物多样性。评估生态系统服务付费对生计影响的研究表明，负面结果更多，对方案设计和付款分配的程序和分配考虑的处理不均衡，评估框架也存在很大差异。我们提出了一个议程，未来的生态系统服务费用计算研究的基础上，新出现的兴趣，更严格地评估环境的结果和记录的社会影响，在一个更比较和上下文的形式。
We undertake a review of academic literature that examines the effectiveness and equity-related performance of PES initiatives targeting biodiversity conservation in tropical and sub-tropical countries. We investigate the key features of such analyses as regards their analytical and methodological approach and we identify emerging lessons from PES practice, leading to a new suggested research agenda. Our results indicate that analyses of PES effectiveness have to date focused on either ecosystem service provision or habitat proxies, with only half of them making explicit assessment of additionality and most describing that payments have been beneficial for land cover and biodiversity. Studies evaluating the impact of PES on livelihoods suggest more negative outcomes, with an uneven treatment of the procedural and distributive considerations of scheme design and payment distribution, and a large heterogeneity of evaluative frameworks. We propose an agenda for future PES research based on the emerging interest in assessing environmental outcomes more rigorously and documenting social impacts in a more comparative and contextually situated form.