Coercion, Cooperation, and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands

Coercion, Cooperation, and Control: Understanding the Policy Impact of Administrative Courts and the Ombudsman in the Netherlands
复制标题

强制、合作和控制:了解荷兰行政法院和监察员的政策影响

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2001
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
M. Hertogh
M. Hertogh
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. Hertogh

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文探讨了荷兰行政法院和国家监察员寻求控制行政行为的方式,旨在开发一种在更广泛的背景下也有用的启发式模型。将介绍两种控制方式:“强制”和“合作”。对两个行政机构进行了探索性的经验研究,调查法院和监察员决定的执行过程。本文认为,法院和申诉专员的政策影响可能与他们的控制风格直接相关。需要更多的实证研究来评估这一假设。
This article examines the way in which administrative courts and the National Ombudsman in the Netherlands seek to control administrative action, and is aimed at developing a heuristic model that can also be useful in a wider context. Two styles of control will be introduced: “coercive” and “cooperative.” An exploratory empirical study was conducted of two administrative agencies, investigating the implementation process of court and ombudsman decisions. This article argues that it is likely that the policy impact of the courts and the ombudsman is directly related to their style of control. More empirical research is needed to evaluate this hypothesis.