Re-Making fashion experience: A model for ‘participatory research through clothing design’

Re-Making fashion experience: A model for ‘participatory research through clothing design’
复制标题

重塑时尚体验:“通过服装设计参与式研究”的模式

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Sadkowska
A. Sadkowska
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
K. Townsend;A. Sadkowska

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本文提出了一个参与式研究模式的基础上,两个案例研究,涉及的研究和服装制作。近年来,人们对参与式设计研究越来越感兴趣,特别是在纺织品和服装方面。围绕服装的作用、价值和用途开展的各种基于实践的举措已证明,在开发和应用旨在激活或记录创造性成果的研究方法方面取得了成功,同时与参与者的经验知识和反馈保持一致。在社会和设计创新背景下工作的研究人员指出,迫切需要建立新的可持续实践文化,通过分享专家和业余知识和技能来挑战增长模式。因此,现在有一个重要的机会,可以更正式地阐明一个可转让的模式,通过共同努力实现参与性参与的原则。 本文通过对两个连续的合作研究调查的批判性分析,提出了一个“通过服装设计进行参与式研究”的工作模式。作者认为,该模型由五个参与阶段组成:(I)沟通和倾听,(II)参与,(III)激活和响应,(IV)咨询和(V)分享,在考虑基于工艺的研究愿望和目标时提供了一个有用的途径。作者试图强调研究人员在与他人合作时所面临的一些实际机会和道德责任,同时描述两个案例研究所提出的一些挑战和潜在陷阱。
The paper presents a participatory research model based on two case studies, involving the making of the research and the making of the clothing. In recent years, there has been growing interest in participatory design research, especially in relation to textiles and clothing. Various practice-based initiatives focused around the role, value and use of clothing have demonstrated success in developing and applying research methodologies aimed at activating or recording creative outcomes while staying attuned to participants’ experiential knowledge and feedback. Researchers working across social and design innovation contexts point to the urgent need for new cultures of sustainable practice that challenge the growth model through the sharing of expert and amateur knowledge and skills. Consequently, an important opportunity now exists to more formally explicate a transferable model of principles for participatory engagement through making together. Based on critical analysis of two consecutive collaborative research inquiries, this article posits a working model of ‘participatory research through clothing design’. The authors suggest that the model, consisting of five stages of participation: (I) communicating and listening, (II) involving, (III) activating and responding, (IV) consulting, and (V) sharing, offers a useful pathway when considering craft-based research aspirations and goals. The authors seek to highlight some of the practical opportunities and ethical responsibilities faced by researchers when making with others, while delineating some of the challenges and potential pitfalls raised by both case studies.