Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy
Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/01939459922044162
复制
发表时间：
1999-12-01
影响因子：
1.8
通讯作者：
Kendall, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kendall, J
本文旨在描述两种扎根理论研究方法的异同：以格拉泽为代表的扎根理论和以施特劳斯和柯尔宾为代表的扎根理论。这篇文章的焦点是围绕使用轴向编码的争议。作者提出了一种解决争议的方法，认为不需要将任何一种方法视为对或错，而是定性的、有根据的理论研究者可以在方法上进行选择，这种选择是基于研究者的研究目标。这两种方法的例子，来自作者对与患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的孩子生活在一起的经历的研究，提供了这两种方法的例子。
The purpose of this article is to describe the similarities and differences between two approaches to grounded theory research: grounded theory as espoused by Glaser and grounded theory as espoused by Strauss and Corbin. The focus of the article is the controversy surrounding the use of axial coding. The author proposes a resolution to the controversy by suggesting that one does not need to view either approach as right or wrong; rather the qualitative and grounded theory researcher can choose on approach, and that choice is based on the goal of the researcher's study. Examples of both approaches, from the author's research study on the experiences of living in a family with a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), are provided.