The International Criminal Court and restorative justice: victims, participation and the processes of justice
The International Criminal Court and restorative justice: victims, participation and the processes of justice
复制标题
国际刑事法院和恢复性司法：受害者、参与和司法程序
DOI：
10.1080/20504721.2017.1339953
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Claire Garbett
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Claire Garbett
摘要直到最近，国际刑事法院（ICC）才将其法律的实践描述为在报复性司法和恢复性司法之间提供平衡。据认为，恢复性司法通过受害者参与法律的诉讼程序的框架取得了进展。然而，关于最高法院如何或是否梅特斯恢复性司法的研究很少。本文首先认为恢复性司法的关键支柱为“和解”，“修正”和“重返社会”，以及受害者参与这些做法的形式。然后，它探讨了国际刑事法院如何调整到恢复性司法优先考虑的受害者的直接参与，并表明，受害者不持有这种参与的可能性。相反，法律的专业人员直接参与对话和决策进程。使用布迪厄的框架的司法领域，本文确定了主要原因没有直接的受害者参与，并认为，国际刑事法院主要功能作为一个报复性的方法来解决冲突。
ABSTRACT Until recently, the International Criminal Court (ICC) described its legal practices as offering a balance between retributive and restorative justice. It was held that restorative justice was progressed through its framework of victim participation in legal proceedings. However, there is little research into how, or whether, the Court metes out restorative justice. This article first considers the key pillars of restorative justice as ‘encounter’, ‘amends’ and ‘reintegration’, and the form of victim participation within these practices. It then examines how the ICC aligns to the direct participation of victims prioritised by restorative justice, and shows that victims do not hold such participatory possibilities. Instead, legal professionals take on direct participation in dialogue and decision-making processes. Using Bourdieu’s framing of the juridical field, the article identifies key reasons for the absence of direct victim participation and argues that the ICC primarily functions as a retributive approach to the resolution of conflict.