Testing Neoliberal Institutionalism in Southeast Asia
Testing Neoliberal Institutionalism in Southeast Asia
复制标题
在东南亚检验新自由主义制度主义
DOI：
10.1177/002070209505000410
复制
发表时间：
1995
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
N. Ganesan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Ganesan
新自由主义制度主义的决定性特征是它相信国际结构会演变、成熟并逐渐取代国家主权。在这方面，自由主义传统带有一种支持超国家主义的目的论偏见。两极格局的瓦解和意识形态引发的冲突的消散，被自由制度主义者视为实现这种国际结构并实际上使其倍增的有利环境。本文试图为后冷战时代新自由主义制度主义对国际关系的解释提供一个与直觉相反的视角。它认为，冷战的意识形态外衣使各国之间的互补利益得到了更明确的孤立。在涉及共同利益的地方，往往会有政策协作，在涉及共同厌恶的地方，往往会有政策协调。前者旨在使志同道合的国家之间的合作制度化，后者则是为了转移来自按照不同假设和动机行事的国家的压力。因此，后冷战时期使一些国家失去了相互合作的一个重要问题，无论是政策协作还是协调。
Neoliberal institutionalism's defining characteristic is its faith in international structures to evolve, mature, and gradually replace state sovereignty. In this regard, the liberal tradition carries a teleological bias in favour of supranationalism. The collapse of bipolarity and the dissipation of ideologically inspired conflicts is viewed by liberal institutionalists as a conducive environment for the realization and indeed multiplication of such international structures. This article seeks to provide a counter-intuitive perspective to the neoliberal institutionalist interpretation of international relations in the post-Cold War era. It argues that the ideological trappings of the Cold War allowed for a clearer isolation of complementary interests among states. Where common interests were concerned, there tended to be policy collaboration, and where common aversions were concerned, there tended to be policy co-ordination.' The former was meant to institutionalize co-operation among like-minded states and the latter to deflect pressures from states that acted on a different set of assumptions and motivations. Thus, the post-Cold War period has deprived some countries of an important issue for mutual co-operation, whether it be policy collaboration or co-ordination.