HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE
HOW WE SHOULD MEASURE CHANGE - OR SHOULD WE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0029382
复制
发表时间：
1970-01-01
影响因子：
22.4
通讯作者：
CRONBACH, LJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
CRONBACH, LJ
检查程序以前推荐的各种作者的“变化”的分数，“残差”或“无基线”的变化措施，和其他种类的差异分数的估计。本文推广了FM Lord提出的一种方法，得到了更精确的估计，并给出了LR Tucker，F. Damarin和SA Messick（见41：3）的程序提供。考虑的目的，在过去的变化措施已寻求导致一系列的建议程序，解决研究和人事决策问题，而不估计个人的变化分数。(22参考文献）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Examines procedures previously recommended by various authors for the estimation of" change" scores," residual," or" basefree" measures of change, and other kinds of difference scores. A procedure proposed by FM Lord is extended to obtain more precise estimates, and an alternative to the LR Tucker, F. Damarin, and SA Messick (see 41: 3) procedure is offered. A consideration of the purposes for which change measures have been sought in the past leads to a series of recommended procedures which solve research and personnel-decision problems without estimation of change scores for individuals.(22 ref.)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)