Comparison of the caudal and lumbar approaches to the epidural space
Comparison of the caudal and lumbar approaches to the epidural space
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/ard.59.11.879
复制
发表时间:
2000-11-01
影响因子:
27.4
通讯作者:
Arden, NK
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Price, CM;Rogers, PD;Arden, NK
Objectives-To investigate the accuracy of placement of epidural injections using the lumbar and caudal approaches. To identify which factors, if any, predicted successful placement.Methods-200 consecutive patients referred to a pain clinic for an epidural injection of steroid were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group L had a lumbar approach to the epidural space and group C a caudal approach to the epidural space. Both groups then had epidurography performed using Omnipaque and an image intensifier to determine the position of the needle.Results-Body mass index (BMI), grade of operator, and route of injection were predictors of a successful placement. 93% of lumbar and 64% of caudal epidural injections were correctly placed (p < 0.001). 97% of lumbar and 85% of caudal epidural injections clinically thought to be correctly placed were confirmed radiographically. For epidural injections where the clinical impression was "maybe", 91% of lumbar injections, but only 45% of caudal injections were correctly placed. Obesity was associated with a reduced chance of successful placement (odds ratio (OR) 0.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.72) BMI >30 v BMI