Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry.
Measurement reliability and agreement in psychiatry.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1191/096228098672090967
复制
发表时间：
1998-09-01
影响因子：
2.3
通讯作者：
Shrout, P E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shrout, P E
精神病学研究受益于对可靠性测量理论的关注，精神病理学评级和诊断的可靠性/一致性统计数据定期在经验报告中报告。然而，关于如何测量信度，以及在研究项目中应该花费多少资源来研究测量质量，仍然存在争议。这些问题进行了讨论的背景下，最近的理论和技术贡献的可靠性的统计分析。特别注意自Kraemer 1992年在该杂志上发表的可靠性方法评论以来的统计研究。
Psychiatric research has benefited from attention to measurement theories of reliability, and reliability/agreement statistics for psychopathology ratings and diagnoses are regularly reported in empirical reports. Nevertheless, there are still controversies regarding how reliability should be measured, and the amount of resources that should be spent on studying measurement quality in research programs. These issues are discussed in the context of recent theoretical and technical contributions to the statistical analysis of reliability. Special attention is paid to statistical studies published since Kraemer's 1992 review of reliability methods in this journal.