Lung Injury Prediction Score in Hospitalized Patients at Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Lung Injury Prediction Score in Hospitalized Patients at Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1097/ccm.0000000000002001
复制
发表时间:
2016-12
影响因子:
8.8
通讯作者:
Gong MN
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Soto GJ;Kor DJ;Park PK;Hou PC;Kaufman DA;Kim M;Yadav H;Teman N;Hsu MC;Shvilkina T;Grewal Y;De Aguirre M;Gunda S;Gajic O;Gong MN
The lung injury prediction score (LIPS) identifies patients at risk for ARDS in the emergency department (ED) but it has not been validated in non-ED hospitalized patients. We aimed to evaluate whether LIPS identifies non-ED hospitalized patients at risk of developing ARDS at the time of critical care contact. Retrospective study. Five academic medical centers. Nine hundred consecutive patients (≥18 y/o) with at least one ARDS risk factor at the time of critical care contact. None. LIPS was calculated using the worst values within the 12 hours before initial critical care contact. Patients with ARDS at the time of initial contact were excluded. ARDS developed in 124 (13.7%) patients a median of 2 days (IQR 2–3) after critical care contact. Hospital mortality was 22% and was significantly higher in ARDS than non-ARDS patients (48% vs. 18%, p<0.001). Increasing LIPS was significantly associated with development of ARDS (OR 1.31, 95%CI 1.21–1.42) and the composite outcome of ARDS or death (OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.18–1.34). A LIPS ≥ 4 was associated with the development of ARDS (OR 4.17, 95%CI 2.26–7.72), composite outcome of ARDS or death (OR 2.43, 95%CI 1.68–3.49), and ARDS after accounting for the competing risk of death (HR 3.71, 95%CI 2.05–6.72). For ARDS development, the LIPS has an AUROC of 0.70 and a LIPS ≥ 4 has 90% sensitivity (misses only 10% of ARDS cases), 31% specificity, 17% positive predictive value, and 95% negative predictive value. In a cohort of non-ED hospitalized patients, the LIPS and LIPS ≥ 4 can identify patients at increased risk of ARDS and/or death at the time of critical care contact but it does not perform as well as in the original ED cohort.