Book Review: Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines

Book Review: Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/109821409902000321
复制
发表时间:
1999-09
影响因子:
1.7
通讯作者:
Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ -Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ;B. Reviews;B. Worthen;James R. Sanders;Jody L;S. Kay;Rockwell
Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ -Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ;B. Reviews;B. Worthen;James R. Sanders;Jody L;S. Kay;Rockwell
中科院分区:
法学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ Ⅵ -Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ-Ⅵ;B. Reviews;B. Worthen;James R. Sanders;Jody L;S. Kay;Rockwell

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

书籍适用于广泛领域的程序评估进行审查。书籍可以单独或成组地进行评论,以阐明在意图、哲学和实用性方面的异同。有书籍评论建议的人,或希望提交评论的人,应联系Perry Sailor(计划,预算和分析,科罗拉多大学博尔德分校,校园15号,博尔德CO 80309; 303-492-2514或电子邮件:perry.sailor@colorado.edu)。一般来说,对一本书的评论不应超过四张双倍行距的打字页;成组的书可能需要额外的长度。在过去,AJE的政策是委托对每本书进行单独的评论。这将继续是大多数书籍的做法,但对于编辑和/或书评编辑认为是主要评价作品的书籍,将委托撰写两篇评论。这些主要的评估书籍将包括评估文本,评估阅读的编辑书籍,或其他专门用于扩展评估理论或实践的书籍。相反,侧重于评估和其他学科或专业(例如,统计、测量、观察方法)共享的方法或技术的书籍将获得单一审查。
Books applicable to the broad field of program evaluation are reviewed. Books may be reviewed singly or in groups to illuminate similarities and differences in intent, philosophy, and usefulness. Persons with suggestions of books to be reviewed, or those who wish to submit a review, should contact Perry Sailor (Planning, Budget, and Analysis, University of Colorado at Boulder, Campus Box 15, Boulder CO 80309; 303-492-2514 or e-mail: perry.sailor@colorado.edu). In general, a review of an individual book should not exceed four double-spaced typewritten pages; groups of books may require additional length. In the past, AJE policy has been to commission a single review for each book. That will continue to be the practice for most books, but two reviews will be commissioned for books judged by the Editor and/or Book Review Editor to be major works in evaluation. Such major evaluation books would include evaluation texts, edited books of evaluation readings, or other books dedicated solely to extending evaluation theory or practice. Conversely, books that focus on methods or techniques shared by evaluation and other disciplines or professions (e.g., statistics; measurement; observation methods) will receive a single review.