Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences

Conservation of Resources in the Organizational Context: The Reality of Resources and Their Consequences
复制标题

DOI:
10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
复制
发表时间:
2018-01-01
期刊:
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, VOL 5
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Westman, Mina
Westman, Mina
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hobfoll, Stevan E.;Halbesleben, Jonathon;Westman, Mina

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

近30年来,资源保护理论(conservation of resources, COR)已成为组织心理学和组织行为学中被广泛引用的理论之一。COR理论已经被广泛应用于压力谱的许多领域,从倦怠到创伤性压力。进一步证明了该理论的中心性,COR理论在很大程度上是更具体工作的组织压力主导理论,即工作需求-资源模型的基础。COR理论的主要优点之一是它能够提出范围广泛的具体假设,这些假设比那些专注于单一中心资源(如控制)或一般资源的理论所提供的假设要广泛得多。在这篇文章中,我们将重新审视COR理论的原则和推论,这些原则和推论为那些更具体的假设提供了信息,并将回顾依赖于该理论的组织行为学研究。
Over the past 30 years, conservation of resources (COR) theory has become one of the most widely cited theories in organizational psychology and organizational behavior. COR theory has been adopted across the many areas of the stress spectrum, from burnout to traumatic stress. Further attesting to the theory's centrality, COR theory is largely the basis for the more work-specific leading theory of organizational stress, namely the job demands-resources model. One of the major advantages of COR theory is its ability to make a wide range of specific hypotheses that are much broader than those offered by theories that focus on a single central resource, such as control, or that speak about resources in general. In this article, we will revisit the principles and corollaries of COR theory that inform those more specific hypotheses and will review research in organizational behavior that has relied on the theory.