Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions
Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143
复制
发表时间：
1997-02-01
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
Schmitt, N
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chan, D;Schmitt, N
在区分测试内容和测试方法的基础上，本研究以241名心理学本科生（113名黑人和128名白人）为样本，研究了与种族、阅读理解、评估方法、面孔效度感知和情境判断测试表现有关的几个概念和实践上重要的影响。结果表明，在情境判断测试成绩和面部效度反应上，基于视频的测试方法与纸笔测试方法相比，黑人和白人在情境判断测试中的差异要小得多。种族X方法对测试成绩的交互作用可归因于与种族和测试方法相关的阅读理解和面孔效度反应的差异。研究结果的意义是在研究的背景下讨论不良影响和考生的测试反应。
On the basis of a distinction between test content and method of testing, the present study examined several conceptually and practically important effects relating race, reading comprehension, method of assessment, face validity perceptions, and performance on a situational judgment test using a sample of 241 psychology undergraduates (113 Blacks and 128 Whites). Results showed that the Black-White differences in situational judgment test performance and face validity reactions to the test were substantially smaller in the video-based method of testing than in the paper-and-pencil method. The Race X Method interaction effect on test performance was attributable to differences in reading comprehension and face validity reactions associated with race and method of testing. Implications of the findings were discussed in the context of research on adverse impact and examinee test reactions.