A too-good-to-be-true prior to reduce shortcut reliance.
A too-good-to-be-true prior to reduce shortcut reliance.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.patrec.2022.12.010
复制
发表时间:
2023-02
影响因子:
5.1
通讯作者:
Love, Bradley C.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dagaev, Nikolay;Roads, Brett D.;Luo, Xiaoliang;Barry, Daniel N.;Patil, Kaustubh R.;Love, Bradley C.
Challenging machine learning problems are unlikely to have trivial solutions. Solutions from low-capacity models are likely shortcuts that won’t generalize. One inductive bias for robust generalization is to avoid overly simple solutions. A low-capacity model can identify shortcuts to help train a high-capacity model. Despite their impressive performance in object recognition and other tasks under standard testing conditions, deep networks often fail to generalize to out-of-distribution (o.o.d.) samples. One cause for this shortcoming is that modern architectures tend to rely on ǣshortcutsǥ superficial features that correlate with categories without capturing deeper invariants that hold across contexts. Real-world concepts often possess a complex structure that can vary superficially across contexts, which can make the most intuitive and promising solutions in one context not generalize to others. One potential way to improve o.o.d. generalization is to assume simple solutions are unlikely to be valid across contexts and avoid them, which we refer to as the too-good-to-be-true prior. A low-capacity network (LCN) with a shallow architecture should only be able to learn surface relationships, including shortcuts. We find that LCNs can serve as shortcut detectors. Furthermore, an LCN’s predictions can be used in a two-stage approach to encourage a high-capacity network (HCN) to rely on deeper invariant features that should generalize broadly. In particular, items that the LCN can master are downweighted when training the HCN. Using a modified version of the CIFAR-10 dataset in which we introduced shortcuts, we found that the two-stage LCN-HCN approach reduced reliance on shortcuts and facilitated o.o.d. generalization.
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Malhotra, Gaurav;Evans, Benjamin D.;Bowers, Jeffrey S.
通讯作者:
Bowers, Jeffrey S.