Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach.
Access to nutritious food, socioeconomic individualism and public health ethics in the USA: a common good approach.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1747-5341-8-16
复制
发表时间：
2013-10-29
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Joy TR
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Azétsop J;Joy TR
良好的营养对个人在生命的各个阶段的最佳生长、发育、健康和福祉起着重要作用。健康的饮食可以降低患慢性病的风险，如心脏病、中风、糖尿病和某些类型的癌症。然而，塑造食物环境的资本主义心态导致了食物的商品化。食物不像其他商品一样只是一种可销售的商品。食品不同于市场上的其他商品，因为它与我们人类的存在有着明确和内在的联系。虽然拥有另一种商品可以带来社会利益，但食物确保了生存。在美利坚合众国，数百万人要么营养不良，要么粮食不安全。本文的目的是利用共同利益的四种含义——作为社会正义的框架、修辞手段、伦理概念和实用工具，对当前的粮食系统进行批判。本文的第一部分概述了共同利益的概念。第二部分概述了共同利益的四种含义如何帮助我们理解公共实践、社会政策和市场价值，这些因素塑造了营养食品难以获得的远端因果因素。然后，我们概述了获得营养食品的政策和赋权举措。
Good nutrition plays an important role in the optimal growth, development, health and well-being of individuals in all stages of life. Healthy eating can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as heart disease, stroke, diabetes and some types of cancer. However, the capitalist mindset that shapes the food environment has led to the commoditization of food. Food is not just a marketable commodity like any other commodity. Food is different from other commodities on the market in that it is explicitly and intrinsically linked to our human existence. While possessing another commodity allows for social benefits, food ensures survival. Millions of people in United States of America are either malnourished or food insecure. The purpose of this paper is to present a critique of the current food system using four meanings of the common good--as a framework, rhetorical device, ethical concept and practical tool for social justice. The first section of this paper provides a general overview of the notion of the common good. The second section outlines how each of the four meanings of the common good helps us understand public practices, social policies and market values that shape the distal causal factors of nutritious food inaccessibility. We then outline policy and empowerment initiatives for nutritious food access.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
Drewnowski, A
通讯作者：
Drewnowski, A
DOI：
10.1186/1747-5341-6-16
发表时间：
2011-12-16
期刊：
Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM
影响因子：
--
作者：
Azetsop, Jacquineau;Joy, Tisha R
通讯作者：
Joy, Tisha R
影响因子：
12.7
作者：
French, SA;Jeffery, RW;Snyder, MP
通讯作者：
Snyder, MP
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Boden-Albala, Bernadette;Elkind, Mitchell S. V.;Sacco, Ralph L.
通讯作者：
Sacco, Ralph L.
DOI：
10.1080/07315724.2000.10718969
发表时间：
2000-06-01
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
Cleveland, LE;Moshfegh, AJ;Goldman, JD
通讯作者：
Goldman, JD