Positive and negative affect within the realm of depression, stress and fatigue: The two-factor distress model of the Global Mood Scale (GMS)
Positive and negative affect within the realm of depression, stress and fatigue: The two-factor distress model of the Global Mood Scale (GMS)
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jad.2005.12.044
复制
发表时间：
2006-04-01
影响因子：
6.6
通讯作者：
De Vries, J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Denollet, J;De Vries, J
背景：全球情绪量表（GMS; [Denollet，J.，1993年a。冠心病患者的情绪困扰和疲劳：总体情绪量表（GMS）。Psychol Med 23，111-121.，Denollet，J.，1993年b。心脏康复预后评估的敏感性。《临床心理咨询杂志》61，686-695。]）最初是作为衡量心脏病患者的积极情感（PA）和消极情感（NA）而开发的。本研究的目的是检验其双因素情感模型在工作成年人领域的压力，抑郁和疲劳。方法：情感，压力，抑郁和疲劳的有效问卷评估的样本228成人（49.6%为男性;平均年龄=41.4 +/- 9岁）。GMS PA和NA量表内部一致（克朗巴赫α = 0.94和α = 0.93，分别），并在预期的方向与积极和消极情绪量表（PANAS）的相应情绪量表相关。因素分析的40个情绪条款，包括GMS和PANAS产生了一个共同的PA尺寸，但两个NA尺寸反映情绪衰竭（GMS）和焦虑忧虑（PANAS）作为不同的组成部分的压力过程。一个相对较高的平均NA评分的GMS表明，这些工作的成年人认为，是指不适/失活的相关术语来描述他们的负面情感状态。GSM-NA量表与压力，抑郁和疲劳，而GMS-PA量表与生活质量呈正相关。限制：本研究是基于一个横截面design.Conclusions：的PA（负相关）和NA（正相关）量表的GMS和感知压力，抑郁症状，疲劳之间的关联支持其双因素模型的有效性。PA和NA的评估可能有助于更好地了解成年人的情绪困扰。(c)2006 Elsevier B.V保留所有权利。
Background: The Global Mood Scale (GMS; [Denollet, J., 1993a. Emotional distress and fatigue in coronary heart disease: the Global Mood Scale (GMS). Psychol Med 23, 111-121., Denollet, J., 1993b. The sensitivity of outcome assessment in cardiac rehabilitation. J Consult Clin Psychol 61, 686-695.]) was originally developed as a measure of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) in cardiac patients. The purpose of this study was to examine its two-factor affect model in the realm of stress, depression, and fatigue in working adults.Methods: Affect, stress, depression, and fatigue were assessed with validated questionnaires in a sample of 228 adults (49.6% male; mean=41.4 +/- 9 years) from the working population.Results: The GMS PA and NA scales were internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha=.94 and alpha=.93, respectively), and correlated in the expected direction with their corresponding mood scales from the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Factor analyses of the 40 mood terms comprising the GMS and PANAS yielded one common PA-dimension, but two NA-dimensions reflecting emotional exhaustion (GMS) and anxious apprehension (PANAS) as different components of the stress process. A relatively high mean NA score of the GMS suggested that these working adults perceived terms that refer to malaise/deactivation as being relevant to describe their negative affective status. The GSM-NA scale was related to stress, depression and fatigue while the GMS-PA scale was positively associated with quality of life.Limitations: This study is based on a cross-sectional design.Conclusions: The association between the PA (negative correlation) and NA (positive correlation) scales of the GMS and perceived stress, depressive symptoms, and fatigue supports the validity of its two-factor model. Assessment of both PA and NA may benefit a better understanding of emotional distress in adults from the working population. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.