Counterpoint.
Counterpoint.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1745691616677829
复制
发表时间：
2017-03
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Durgin FH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Durgin FH
关于基于能量操纵（和其他影响）的感知改变的主张通常被认为是有趣的，因为它们影响了我们的感知体验。然而，许多关于这种效应的控制实验表明，它们是归因效应和其他类型的判断偏见影响报告过程的结果，而不是感知本身。在此基础上，作者对海德关于归因的研究进行了探讨，认为试图区分知觉和归因是徒劳的。这使得能量假说不那么令人感兴趣。
Claims about alterations in perception based on manipulations of energetics (and other influences) are often framed as interesting specifically because they affect our perceptual experience. Many control experiments conducted on such effects suggest, however, that they are the result of attribution effects and other kinds of judgmental biases influencing the reporting process rather than perception itself., appealing to Heider’s work on attribution, argues that it is fruitless to try to distinguish between perception and attribution. This renders the energetics hypothesis of less interest.