THE SAGITTAL GROWTH OF THE EYE

THE SAGITTAL GROWTH OF THE EYE
复制标题

眼睛的矢状生长

DOI:
10.1111/j.1755-3768.1971.tb00949.x
复制
发表时间:
1971
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
J. Larsen
J. Larsen
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Larsen

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

Hrlmholiz (1855) 是第一个描述测量体内前房深度的光学方法的人。 Mandelstam 和 Sclzoler (1872) 对该方法进行了修改,同年 Donders 发表了对其测量技术的描述。从那时起,Lindstedt (1914)、Ulbrich (1914)、Jaeger (1952) 等人描述了许多用于此目的的光学方法。 Goldmann (1940)、He i m (1941) 等人推荐了几种用于测量前房深度的摄影技术。据称,通过这些方法可以测量前房深度,精度可达0.02毫米。 Mundt & Hughes (1956) 和 Oksala & Lelztinen (1957) 的开创性工作证明了在眼科中使用超声波进行生物测量的可能性。自 1960 年代初以来,已经发表了许多关于眼内距离测量的著作(Yamarnoto、Namiki、Baba & Kato 1961、Franken 1961、Purnell & Sokollu 1962、Gernet 1963、1964、1965、Gernet & Hollwich 1968、Jansson 1963、Nover & Grote 1965。Luyckx 1966,Nakajima & Kimura 1966,Weekers,LuyckxlBacus & Weekers 1966。I t in & Brawand 1968,Lowe 1968,Pallin 1969)。有人声称超声波测量技术不够精确(Baum & Greenwood 1961,Baurn 1967)。其他人发现该方法既合适又准确。 Jansson (1963) 测量了深度
Hrlmholiz (1855) was the first to describe an optical method of measuring the depth of the anterior chamber in vivo. This method was modified by Mandelstam & Sclzoler (1872), and in the same year Donders published a description of his measuring technique. Since then a number of optical methods for this purpose has been described, by Lindstedt (1914), Ulbrich (1914) Jaeger (1952) and others. Several photographic techniques have been recommended for the measurement of the depth of the anterior chamber, by Goldmann (1940), H e i m (1941), and others. It is alleged that the depth of the anterior chamber can be measured by these methods to an accuracy of 0.02 mm. The possibility of using ultrasound to make biometric measurements in ophthalmology was demonstrated by the pioneer work of Mundt & Hughes (1956) and by Oksala & Lelztinen (1957). Since the beginning of the 1960’s numerous works have been published on the measurement of intraocular distances (Yamarnoto, Namiki , Baba & Kato 1961, Franken 1961, Purnell & Sokollu 1962, Gernet 1963, 1964, 1965, Gernet & Hollwich 1968, Jansson 1963, Nover & Grote 1965. Luyckx 1966, Nakajima & Kimura 1966, Weekers , LuyckxlBacus & Weekers 1966. I t in & Brawand 1968, Lowe 1968, Pallin 1969). I t has been claimed that the ultrasonic measuring technique is not sufficiently accurate (Baum & Greenwood 1961, Baurn 1967). Others have found the method both suitable and accurate. Jansson (1963) measured the depth of the an-