Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts

Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0096-1523.22.6.1331
复制
发表时间:
1996-12-01
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Lupker, SJ
Lupker, SJ
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hino, Y;Lupker, SJ

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在词汇判断和命名任务中考察了一词多义和词频的效应。在这两个任务中观察到一词多义效应。在词汇判断任务中,高频词和低频词产生了相同的多义效应。然而,在命名任务中,一词多义与频率交互作用,一词多义效应仅限于低频词。当两种任务都使用降级刺激时,这种交互作用不仅出现在命名上,而且出现在词汇判断上。由于刺激退化也产生了影响拼写的声音规律性的词汇决策任务,一词多义和频率之间的不同关系似乎是由于是否响应主要是基于拼写或语音代码。因此,一词多义的影响似乎是由于特定任务过程的性质。用M. S. Seidenberg和J.L. McClelland's(1989)和D. C. Plaut和J.L.提出了McClelland(1993)的并行分布处理模型。
The effects of polysemy (number of meanings) and word frequency were examined in lexical decision and naming tasks. Polysemy effects were observed in both tasks. In the lexical decision task, high- and low-frequency words produced identical polysemy effects. In the naming task, however, polysemy interacted with frequency, with polysemy effects being limited to low-frequency words. When degraded stimuli were used in both tasks, the interaction appeared not only in naming but also in lexical decision. Because stimulus degradation also produced an effect of spelling-sound regularity in the lexical decision task, the different relationships between polysemy and frequency appear to be due to whether responding was based primarily on orthographic or phonological codes. As such, the effects of polysemy seem to be due to the nature of task-specific processes. An explanation in terms of M. S. Seidenberg and J. L. McClelland's (1989) and D. C. Plaut and J. L. McClelland's (1993) parallel distributed processing models is proposed.