The UN is Bound by Human Rights: Understanding the Full Reach of Human Rights, Remedies, and Nonimmunity

The UN is Bound by Human Rights: Understanding the Full Reach of Human Rights, Remedies, and Nonimmunity
复制标题

联合国受人权约束:了解人权、补救措施和非豁免的全面影响

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Paust
J. Paust
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
J. Paust

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

联合国,包括组成该组织的各个实体,是否有义务遵守习惯人权?如果是的话,《联合国宪章》的哪些条款构成了这一义务的基础?联合国及其实体和人员是否也受到人权强制法的约束?在武装冲突时期,战争法是否凌驾于人权法之上?联合国及其实体、国家和个人是否存在侵犯人权的潜在责任?如果存在,联合国是否应该豁免?这些是汤姆·丹南鲍姆在《哈佛杂志》上发表的文章提出的一些重要问题,并在这篇在线文章中得到了解决。
Is the United Nations, including the various entities that comprise the organization, bound to observe customary human rights? If so, what provisions of the United Nations Charter form the basis for such an obligation? Are the United Nations, its entities and personnel also bound by human rights jus cogens? In time of armed conflict, does the law of war override the reach of human rights law? Does potential liability for human rights violations exist for the U.N. and its entities, the state, and the individual, and if so, should the U.N. be immune? These are some of the important questions raised by Tom Dannenbaum’s article in the Harvard Journal and addressed in this on-line essay.