Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root: A single modality approach.
Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of the bicuspid aortic valve and aortic root: A single modality approach.
复制标题
二尖瓣主动脉瓣和主动脉根部的定量三维超声心动图分析:单一模式方法。
DOI:
10.1111/jocs.14387
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
1.6
通讯作者:
Gorman,RobertC
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Levack,MelissaM;Mecozzi,Gianclaudio;Jainandunsing,JayantS;Bouma,Wobbe;Jassar,ArminderS;Pouch,AlisonM;Yushkevich,PaulA;Mariani,MassimoA;Jackson,BenjaminM;Gorman3rd,JosephH;Gorman,RobertC
BackgroundPatients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) are heterogeneous with regard to patterns of root remodeling and valvular dysfunction. Two‐dimensional echocardiography is the standard surveillance modality for patients with aortic valve dysfunction. However, ancillary computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging is often necessary to characterize associated patterns of aortic root pathology. Conversely, the pairing of three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography with novel quantitative modeling techniques allows for a single modality description of the entire root complex. We sought to determine 3D aortic valve and root geometry with this quantitative approach.MethodsTransesophageal real‐time 3D echocardiography was performed in five patients with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) and in five patients with BAV. No patient had evidence of valvular dysfunction or aortic root pathology. A customized image analysis protocol was used to assess 3D aortic annular, valvular, and root geometry.ResultsAnnular, sinus and sinotubular junction diameters and areas were similar in both groups. Coaptation length and area were higher in the TAV group (7.25 ± 0.98 mm and 298 ± 118 mm2, respectively) compared to the BAV group (5.67 ± 1.33 mm and 177 ± 43 mm2;P= .07 andP= .01). Cusp surface area to annular area, coaptation height, and the sub‐ and supravalvular tenting indices did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionsSingle modality 3D echocardiography‐based modeling allows for a quantitative description of the aortic valve and root geometry. This technique together with novel indices will improve our understanding of normal and pathologic geometry in the BAV population and may help to identify geometric predictors of adverse remodeling and guide tailored surgical therapy.