Adjoint functors and triples

Adjoint functors and triples
复制标题

DOI:
10.1215/ijm/1256068141
复制
发表时间:
1965-09
影响因子:
0.6
通讯作者:
S. Eilenberg;John C. Moore
S. Eilenberg;John C. Moore
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
S. Eilenberg;John C. Moore

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

范畴 a 中的波纹 F (F, ,) 由函子 F 和态射 la F, F F 组成,这些恒等式与幺半群中的那些恒等式无关(参见 2, (T.1)-(T.3))。双联重新定义。 Huber [4] 已经认识到,每当一个仿函数 T a 、 Sa (参见 1)的一个 hs pir 时,函子 TS(具有由伴随性关系产生的适当态射)就构成了 a 中的三元组,并且类似地 ST 产生 a 中的三元组。本文的主要目的是证明 d-联合性和三元组之间的这种关系在某种意义上是可逆的。给定 a 中的三元组 Y,我们定义新的类别并添加函子 T a a,S a,使得 TS 给出的三元组一致。我有很多这样的例子,它们以这种方式生成三重 Y,但其中有一个通用的 Y(因此在某种意义上是“最好的可能”),并且对于这个来说,函子 T 是忠实的(定理 2.2)。这种结构最好通过例子来说明。设a为交换环K上的模类别,设A为K-lgebm。函子 F A@ 与由 A 的 K 代数结构给出的态射 K A、h @ A A 产生的态射 nd 一起,产生一个三元组 Y a。那么类别 a 正是 A 模块的类别。 a 的一般结构与此示例非常相似。另一个例子,设 a 为集合的范畴,设 F 为函子,集合 A 指定由 A 生成的自由群的基础集合。结果是 a 中的三元组 Y,a 是群的范畴。
A riple F (F, ,) in ctegory a consists of functor F a nd morphisms la F, F F stisfying some identities (see 2, (T.1)-(T.3)) nlogous to those stisfied in monoid. Cotriples re defined dually. It has been recognized by Huber [4] that whenever one hs pir of adoint functors T a , S a (see 1), then the functor TS (with appropriate morphisms resulting from the adjointness relation) constitutes a triple in nd similarly ST yields cotriple in a. The main objective of this pper is to show that this relation between d-jointness nd triples is in some sense reversible. Given triple Y in a we define new ctegory a nd adoint functors T a a, S a a such that the triple given by TS coincides with. There my be mny adoint pirs which in this wy generate the triple Y, but among those there is a universal one (which therefore is in a sense the "best possible one") nd for this one the functor T is faithful (Theorem 2.2). This construction cn best be illustrated by n example. Let a be the ctegory of modules over a commu-tative ring K nd let A be K-lgebm. The functor F A@ together with morphisms nd resulting from the morphisms K A, h @ A A given by the K-algebra structure of A, yield then a triple Y a. The ctegory a is then precisely the ctegory of A-modules. The general construction of a closely resembles this example. As another example, let a be the category of sets nd let F be the functor which to ech set A ssigns the underlying set of the free group generated by A. There results triple Y in a nd a is the category of groups.