Centering Policy and Practice: Research Gaps Around Usable Differential Privacy
Centering Policy and Practice: Research Gaps Around Usable Differential Privacy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1109/tps-isa58951.2023.00024
复制
发表时间：
2023-11
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Rachel Cummings;Jayshree Sarathy
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Rachel Cummings;Jayshree Sarathy
差异隐私被许多专家视为隐私保护数据分析的“黄金标准”。其他人则认为，虽然差异隐私在理论上是一个干净的表述，但在实践中却不太可行。我们认为，这两种观点都是有效且重要的。为了弥合差距，研究人员和从业者必须共同努力推进差异隐私的政策和实践。在本文中，我们概述了紧迫的悬而未决的问题，并提供了有关使差异隐私在实践中更可用的建议。
Differential privacy is seen by many experts as the ‘gold standard’ for privacy-preserving data analysis. Others argue that while differential privacy is a clean formulation in theory, it is not very workable in practice. Both perspectives are, in our view, valid and important. To bridge the gaps, researchers and practitioners must work together to advance policy and practice of differential privacy. In this paper, we outline the pressing open questions and offer recommendations around making differential privacy more usable in practice.