Deus ut tentus vel visus : Die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt (ca. 1293 – 1320)
Deus ut tentus vel visus : Die Debatte um die Seligkeit im reflexiven Akt (ca. 1293 – 1320)
复制标题
Deus ut tentus vel visus：关于反射行为中的幸福的辩论（约 1293 - 1320）
DOI：
10.1163/9789004191884
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Jeschke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Jeschke
在他的句子评论（出版CA。1320），加尔默罗约翰Baconthorp讨论了是否beatitude是一个反身行为的问题。Pourçain's view that it is knowing that we know God. Pourçain's view that it is knowing that we know God.他指的是约翰的巴黎的观点，其中的福是一种行为，知道我们拥有上帝和圣Pourçain的Durandus认为，这是知道，我们知道上帝。第一个是神的对象（Deus ut tentus），第二个是神的对象（Deus ut visos）。本研究以培根索普的叙述为出发点，采用三重方法：首先，从培根索普自身的角度分析其文本。接下来，它在原始资料的基础上重建了13/14世纪的争论。最后，将培根索普的叙述与历史立场进行比较，进一步得出培根索普的具体方法论。
In his Sentences Commentary (published ca. 1320), the Carmelite John Baconthorp discusses the question of whether beatitude is a reflexive act. He refers to John of Paris’s view in which beatitude is an act of knowing that we possess God and Durandus of St. Pourçain’s view that it is knowing that we know God. The object of the first is God as possessed (Deus ut tentus) and the second is God as known (Deus ut visus). Taking Baconthorp’s account as a starting point, the present study adopts a threefold approach: First it analyzes Baconthorp’s text on its own terms. Next it reconstructs the 13th/14th-century debate on the basis of the original sources. Finally it compares Baconthorp’s narration with the historical positions, drawing further conclusions about Baconthorp’s specific methodology.