Resilience as an Asset for Healthy Development

Resilience as an Asset for Healthy Development
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/978-1-4419-5921-8_6
复制
发表时间:
2010-01-01
期刊:
HEALTH ASSETS IN A GLOBAL CONTEXT: THEORY, METHODS, ACTION
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Blane, David
Blane, David
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bartley, Mel;Schoon, Ingrid;Blane, David

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

本章探讨积极调整和复原力作为一种资产,即使在不利条件下也能促进身体健康。它提出了许多不同的模型来解释弹性是如何起作用的;补偿,保护和挑战。恢复力不是恒定的,而是由物质和社会环境塑造和塑造的。一些人,取决于经济或社会决定因素,将有更多的自由和能力做出健康的选择。以健康饮食为例,说明在某些社区,甚至在社会经济处于一定程度劣势的社区,可以促进健康复原力的一个因素。一些南地中海国家的相对卫生不平等就是一个例子。然而,作者认为,在这些国家,健康优势是由一系列复杂的因素赋予的,而不仅仅是饮食。讨论了去工业化后社会、宗教和民族支持的作用。本文最后分析了当代大量无偿女性劳动(包括体力劳动和体力劳动)从家庭中消失所带来的未被探索的影响,以及这对家庭体力和情感发展的不可估量的影响。男性和女性在家庭中的角色和关系的变化有效地(也许是出乎意料地)消除了有益的健康资产。
This chapter examines positive adjustment and resilience as an asset, which can promote good health, even in adverse conditions. It presents a number of different models that have been put forward to explain how resilience works; compensatory, protective and challenge. Resilience is not a constant but is something moulded and shaped by the physical and social environment. Some people, depending on financial or social determinants, will have more freedom and capacity to make healthy choices. A healthy diet is used as an example of a factor which can promote health resilience in some communities, even those where there are levels of socioeconomic disadvantage. Relative health inequalities in a number of Southern Mediterranean countries are used as an example of this. However, the authors argue that in these countries health advantage is conferred by a much more complex range of factors than diet alone. The role of social, religious and ethnic support following deindustrialisation is discussed. The paper concludes with an analysis of the largely unexplored impact of the contemporary removal of much unpaid female labour (both physical and emotional) from the domestic sphere and the untold impact of this on the physical and emotional development of the family. The changing roles and relationships of men and women within in the family have effectively, and perhaps unexpectedly, removed beneficial health assets.