THE USE OF ACADEMIA.EDU, RESEARCHGATE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, SCOPUS, AND PUBLONS AMONG THE POLISH RESEARCHERS OF SOCIAL COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA SCIENCES
THE USE OF ACADEMIA.EDU, RESEARCHGATE, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, SCOPUS, AND PUBLONS AMONG THE POLISH RESEARCHERS OF SOCIAL COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA SCIENCES
复制标题
DOI：
10.36702/pb.927
复制
发表时间：
2023-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Małgorzata Kisilowska-Szurmińska;Marzena Świgoń;Ewa Głowacka
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Małgorzata Kisilowska-Szurmińska;Marzena Świgoń;Ewa Głowacka
目的-定义波兰研究人员在科学网站（谷歌Scholar、ResearchGate、Academia.edu、Publons和Scopus）上在社会传播和媒体科学方面的活动程度、文献计量学和其他计量学，以及它们的使用目的。方法论——以570名学者为研究样本进行定量研究。然后对收集到的数据进行统计分析。研究结果和结论——使用网站的强度和方式取决于网站的运行时间、功能差异，但也取决于研究人员的出版和科学活动（在网站上共享书目和文本、交流和信息交流、合作）。
Aim – to define the degree of activity, bibliometrics, and altmetrics of Polish researchers in social communication and media sciences on scientific websites: Google Scholar, ResearchGate, Academia.edu, Publons, and Scopus, and purposes of their use. Methodology – quantitative study on the research sample of 570 academics. The collected data were then subjected to statistical ana- lysis. Findings and conclusions – The intensity and manner of using the websites depend on the period of their operation, differences in functionalities, but also on the publishing and scientific activity (sharing bibliographies and texts on the websites, communication and information exchange, cooperation) of researchers.