Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: gender differences in response systems concordance

Emotional reactivity to social-evaluative stress: gender differences in response systems concordance
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00229-3
复制
发表时间:
1999-07-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Calvo, MG
Calvo, MG
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Avero, P;Calvo, MG

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在社会评价压力下,记录了自我报告的焦虑(认知和躯体),行为焦虑(运动,面部,言语和社会),生理唤醒(心率和皮肤电阻水平)和任务表现(认知和运动)。有低,但理论上有意义的,一致性的反应系统:显着的关系出现在认知方面的措施,和那些关心的躯体方面,但不是这两个领域之间。此外,女性的一致性高于男性,特别是在两个可以自愿控制的反应系统之间(即,自我报告和行为)和不可控系统(即,生理唤醒)。这些差异的一致性作为一个功能的性别解释在男性的情绪反应抑制或掩蔽。(C)1999 Elsevier Science Ltd.保留所有权利。
Under social-evaluative stress, self-reported anxiety (cognitive and somatic), behavioural anxiety (motor, facial, verbal and social), physiological arousal (heart rate and skin resistance level), and task performance (cognitive and motor) were recorded. There was low, but theoretically meaningful, concordance across response systems: significant relationships appeared among measures of cognitive aspects, and among those concerned with somatic aspects, but not between these two areas. Furthermore, concordance was higher in females than in males specifically between the two response systems that can be voluntarily controlled (i.e., self-report and behaviour) and the noncontrollable system (i.e., physiological arousal). These differences in concordance as a function of gender are explained in terms of emotional response suppression or masking in males. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.