Validation of the Japanese Version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (J-YFAS 2.0)
Validation of the Japanese Version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (J-YFAS 2.0)
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/nu11030687
复制
发表时间：
2019-03-22
期刊：
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Yatsuya, Hiroshi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Khine, May Thet;Ota, Atsuhiko;Yatsuya, Hiroshi
耶鲁食物成瘾量表2.0（YFAS 2.0）用于评估食物成瘾（FA）。我们的研究旨在验证其日语版本（J-YFAS 2.0）。研究对象包括731名大学生。验证性因素分析表明，单因素结构模型的近似均方根误差、比较拟合指数、Tucker-Lewis指数和标准化均方根残差分别为0.065、0.904、0.880和0.048。Kuder-Richardson α为0.78。J-YFAS 2.0诊断的轻度、中度和重度FA的患病率分别为1.1%、1.2%和1.0%。18项三因素饮食问卷（TFEQ R-18）的高失控饮食和情绪化饮食评分（p < 0.001）、高Kessler心理困扰量表评分（p < 0.001）、频繁暴饮暴食（p = 0.007）和频繁吃零食（p = 0.003）与J-YFAS 2.0诊断的FA存在相关。与J-YFAS 2.0诊断的FA症状计数有显著相关性（p < 0.01）。最高体重指数与J-YFAS 2.0诊断的FA症状计数相关（p = 0.026）。TFEQ R-18认知限制评分与J-YFAS 2.0诊断的FA存在（p < 0.05）和症状计数（p < 0.001）相关，但与J-YFAS 2.0诊断的FA严重程度无关。与其他语言的YFAS 2.0一样，J-YFAS 2.0具有单因素结构和足够的收敛效度和信度。
The Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) is used for assessing food addiction (FA). Our study aimed at validating its Japanese version (J-YFAS 2.0). The subjects included 731 undergraduate students. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the root-mean-square error of approximation, comparative fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, and standardized root-mean-square residual were 0.065, 0.904, 0.880, and 0.048, respectively, for a one-factor structure model. Kuder-Richardson alpha was 0.78. Prevalence of the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed mild, moderate, and severe FA was 1.1%, 1.2%, and 1.0%, respectively. High uncontrolled eating and emotional eating scores of the 18-item Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ R-18) (p < 0.001), a high Kessler Psychological Distress Scale score (p < 0.001), frequent desire to overeat (p = 0.007), and frequent snacking (p = 0.003) were associated with the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed FA presence. The scores demonstrated significant correlations with the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed FA symptom count (p < 0.01). The highest attained body mass index was associated with the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed FA symptom count (p = 0.026). The TFEQ R-18 cognitive restraint score was associated with the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed FA presence (p < 0.05) and symptom count (p < 0.001), but not with the J-YFAS 2.0-diagnosed FA severity. Like the YFAS 2.0 in other languages, the J-YFAS 2.0 has a one-factor structure and adequate convergent validity and reliability.