Towards integrated research in fisheries science
Towards integrated research in fisheries science
复制标题
迈向渔业科学综合研究
DOI：
10.1007/s12562-014-0727-9
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Y. Sakurai
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Makino;Y. Sakurai
在这篇文章中，我们呼吁将渔业科学重新引导到一项综合的科学活动中，其中包括鱼类从卵和它们在水下的生活到餐桌上消费的轨迹。我们建议将渔业科学的综合研究定义为“针对社会和人类福祉的跨学科研究，该研究涉及动态渔业系统的可持续性，考虑到各种知识、价值和需求。”水产科学作为一门综合性学科，为克服传统科学的局限性提供了诸多优势。能够根据每个学科开展传统的研究活动是参与综合研究的先决条件。然而，还需要“其他进程”，例如引入新的综合思维、共同确定研究框架、参与研究的研究人员相互学习、与利益攸关方互动等。渔业科学的综合研究将能够分析总体影响，包括环境变化和其他海洋产业等外生因素。大眼鳕鱼提供了一个很好的模式物种，用于分析行业结构的未来情景，以及处理和考虑其他高度波动资源的影响的潜在战略。最具挑战性的课题之一是确定从耗尽的库存到未来复苏的可能路径。关于“多快？”的科学分析“谁应该承担这笔费用？”“何时会发生”等，应通过与利益攸关方的密切互动进行。
In this paper we present a call for a re-directing fisheries science towards an integrated scientific activity which includes the trajectory of fish from eggs and their life underwater to consumption on the table. We propose that integrated research in fisheries science be defined as “interdisciplinary research for society and human well-being which deals with the sustainability of dynamic fisheries systems, taking various knowledge, values, and needs into account.” As an integrative discipline, fisheries science offers many advantages to overcoming the limitations of the traditional sciences. The ability to conduct traditional research activities based on each academic discipline is a prerequisite to participating in integrated research. However, “additional processes” are needed, such as the introduction of new integrated thinking, joint determination of the research framework, mutual learning by participating researchers, interaction with stakeholders, among others. Integrated research in fisheries science would allow overall influences to be analyzed, including exogenous factors such as environmental changes and other marine industries. Walleye pollockTheragra chalcogrammaprovides a good model species for analyzing future scenarios of the structure of the industry as well as potential strategies for addressing and considering the effects of other highly fluctuating resources. One of the most challenging topics is identifying possible paths from a depleted stock to its future recovery. Scientific analyses on “How fast?” “Who should bear the costs?” “When it will occur”, etc., should be conducted by close interactions with stakeholders.