Multiethnic polygenic risk scores improve risk prediction in diverse populations.
Multiethnic polygenic risk scores improve risk prediction in diverse populations.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/gepi.22083
复制
发表时间:
2017-12
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
Price AL
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Márquez-Luna C;Loh PR;South Asian Type 2 Diabetes (SAT2D) Consortium;SIGMA Type 2 Diabetes Consortium;Price AL
Methods for genetic risk prediction have been widely investigated in recent years. However, most available training data involves European samples, and it is currently unclear how to accurately predict disease risk in other populations. Previous studies have used either training data from European samples in large sample size or training data from the target population in small sample size, but not both. Here, we introduce a multi-ethnic polygenic risk score that combines training data from European samples and training data from the target population. We applied this approach to predict type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a Latino cohort using both publicly available European summary statistics in large sample size (Neff=40k) and Latino training data in small sample size (Neff=8k). Here, we attained a >70% relative improvement in prediction accuracy (from R2=0.027 to R2=0.047) compared to methods that use only one source of training data, consistent with large relative improvements in simulations. We observed a systematically lower load of T2D risk alleles in Latino individuals with more European ancestry, which could be explained by polygenic selection in ancestral European and/or Native American populations. We predict T2D in a South Asian UK Biobank cohort using European (Neff=40k) and South Asian (Neff=16k) training data and attained a >70% relative improvement in prediction accuracy, and application to predict height in an African UK Biobank cohort using European (N=113k) and African (N=2k) training data attained a 30% relative improvement. Our work reduces the gap in polygenic risk prediction accuracy between European and non-European target populations.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1038/nrg2760
发表时间:
2010-05
期刊:
Nature reviews. Genetics
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Robinson MR;Hemani G;Medina-Gomez C;Mezzavilla M;Esko T;Shakhbazov K;Powell JE;Vinkhuyzen A;Berndt SI;Gustafsson S;Justice AE;Kahali B;Locke AE;Pers TH;Vedantam S;Wood AR;van Rheenen W;Andreassen OA;Gasparini P;Metspalu A;Berg LH;Veldink JH;Rivadeneira F;Werge TM;Abecasis GR;Boomsma DI;Chasman DI;de Geus EJ;Frayling TM;Hirschhorn JN;Hottenga JJ;Ingelsson E;Loos RJ;Magnusson PK;Martin NG;Montgomery GW;North KE;Pedersen NL;Spector TD;Speliotes EK;Goddard ME;Yang J;Visscher PM
通讯作者:
Visscher PM
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Bulik-Sullivan, Brendan K.;Loh, Po-Ru;Finucane, Hilary K.;Ripke, Stephan;Yang, Jian;Patterson, Nick;Daly, Mark J.;Price, Alkes L.;Neale, Benjamin M.
通讯作者:
Neale, Benjamin M.
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Golan, David;Rosset, Saharon
通讯作者:
Rosset, Saharon
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Maier R;Moser G;Chen GB;Ripke S;Cross-Disorder Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium;Coryell W;Potash JB;Scheftner WA;Shi J;Weissman MM;Hultman CM;Landén M;Levinson DF;Kendler KS;Smoller JW;Wray NR;Lee SH
通讯作者:
Lee SH